Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39141882›Full record

ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2024

Evaluating Stuttering Self-Stigma and Its Relationship to Adverse Impact in Children and Adolescents With the Child Stuttering Self-Stigma Scale.

Chelsea A Johnson, Katelyn L Gerwin, Seth E Tichenor, Michael P Boyle, Bridget Walsh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Significance of a Higher Prevalence of ADHD and ADHD Symptoms in Children Who Stutter.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2025
    Article
  5. An Exploratory Comparison of Attitudes toward Stuttering and Cluttering of Chinese Practicing Speech and Language Therapists and SLT Students.Folia phoniatrica et logopaedica : official organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (IALP) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chelsea A JohnsonDepartment of Communicative Sciences and Disorders, Michigan State University, East Lansing.ORCID 0000-0002-7923-3856
Katelyn L GerwinDepartment of Communicative Sciences and Disorders, Michigan State University, East Lansing.ORCID 0000-0002-9410-4382
Seth E TichenorDepartment of Speech-Language Pathology, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA.ORCID 0000-0002-9099-9684
Michael P BoyleDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Montclair State University, Bloomfield, NJ.ORCID 0000-0003-1347-6895
Bridget WalshDepartment of Communicative Sciences and Disorders, Michigan State University, East Lansing.ORCID 0000-0003-3526-7218

Funding

Developmental Trajectories to Stuttering Persistence and RecoveryR01DC018000 · NIDCD · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI WALSH, BRIDGET M · 2020 to 2025
$3.3M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC018000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSelf-stigma occurs when a person internalizes and applies stereotypes, prejudice, and discrimination to themselves. For adults who stutter, self-stigma is linked to negative outcomes and reduced quality of life. The development of self-stigma in people who stutter is not well understood. The aim of this study is to evaluate stuttering self-stigma in school-age children and adolescents and explore potential relationships to stuttering's overall adverse impact.

methodOne hundred one children and adolescents who stutter, aged 10-18 years, completed the Overall Assessment of the Speaker's Experience of Stuttering (OASES), a measure of adverse impact related to stuttering, and the Childhood Self-Stigma of Stuttering Scale (Child 4S), our novel adapted version of the Self-Stigma of Stuttering Scale (4S) created for this study. The Child 4S comprises three subscales measuring three stages of self-stigma: Awareness, Agreement, and Application. Each stage was evaluated for relationships with child age and the adverse impact of stuttering.

resultsWe found a range of self-stigma scores among children and adolescents who stutter. Child age did not correlate with Awareness and Agreement; however, older children and adolescents reported greater Application. All stages of self-stigma strongly predicted adverse impact as measured by the OASES, and latter stages of the model were stronger predictors than earlier stages.

conclusionsChildren as young as 10 years old may experience stuttering self-stigma, and the application of self-stigma increases in adolescence, a critical period in the development of personal identity. Importantly, all stages of self-stigma predicted adverse impact related to stuttering, with latter stages being stronger predictors than earlier ones consistent with the progressive model of self-stigma being tested. The findings highlight the need for targeted, early intervention to mitigate downstream effects of stuttering self-stigma. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.26352556.

Indexed as

Self ConceptSocial StigmaStutteringAdolescentChildFemaleHumansMaleQuality of LifeStereotypingSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID39141882
PMCPMC11427442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.