ArticleThe Journal of physiology2024
Multiple layers of diversity govern the cell type specificity of GABAergic input received by mouse subicular pyramidal neurons.
Article in The Journal of physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Parvalbumin interneurons in Alzheimer's disease: Physiological insights and pathophysiological mechanisms.Journal of cell communication and signaling · 2026Review
- Real-time Monitoring Unveils Three Distinct Neuronal Response Patterns to SAW Ultrasound via L-type Calcium Channels.Neuroscience bulletin · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The subiculum is a key region of the brain involved in the initiation of pathological activity in temporal lobe epilepsy, and local GABAergic inhibition is essential to prevent subicular-originated epileptiform discharges. Subicular pyramidal cells may be easily distinguished into two classes based on their different firing patterns. Here, we have compared the strength of the GABAa receptor-mediated inhibitory postsynaptic currents received by regular- vs. burst-firing subicular neurons and their dynamic modulation by the activation of μ opioid receptors. We have taken advantage of the sequential re-patching of the same cell to initially classify pyramidal neurons according to their firing patters, and then to measure GABAergic events triggered by the optogenetic stimulation of parvalbumin- and somatostatin-expressing interneurons. Activation of parvalbumin-expressing cells generated larger responses in postsynaptic burst-firing neurons whereas the opposite was observed for currents evoked by the stimulation of somatostatin-expressing interneurons. In all cases, events depended critically on ω-agatoxin IVA- but not on ω-conotoxin GVIA-sensitive calcium channels. Optogenetic GABAergic input originating from both parvalbumin- and somatostatin-expressing cells was reduced in amplitude following the exposure to a μ opioid receptor agonist. The kinetics of this pharmacological sensitivity was different in regular- vs. burst-firing neurons, but only when responses were evoked by the activation of parvalbumin-expressing neurons, whereas no differences were observed when somatostatin-expressing cells were stimulated. In conclusion, our results show that a high degree of complexity regulates the organizing principles of subicular GABAergic inhibition, with the interaction of pre- and postsynaptic diversity at multiple levels. KEY POINTS: Optogenetic stimulation of parvalbumin- and somatostatin-expressing interneurons (PVs and SOMs) triggers inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs) in both regular- and burst-firing (RFs and BFs) subicular pyramidal cells. The amplitude of optogenetically evoked IPSCs from PVs (PV-opto IPSCs) is larger in BFs whereas IPSCs generated by the light activation of SOMs (SOM-opto IPSCs) are larger in RFs. Both PV- and SOM-opto IPSCs critically depend on ω-agatoxin IVA-sensitive P/Q type voltage-gated calcium channels, whereas no major effects are observed following exposure to ω-conotoxin GVIA, suggesting no significant involvement of N-type channels. The amplitude of both PV- and SOM-opto IPSCs is reduced by the probable pharmacological activation of presynaptic μ opioid receptors, with a faster kinetics of the effect observed in PV-opto IPSCs from RFs vs. BFs, but not in SOM-opto IPSCs. These results help us understand the complex interactions between different layers of diversity regulating GABAergic input onto subicular microcircuits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.