Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39141688›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2024

Predicting postoperative delirium assessed by the Nursing Screening Delirium Scale in the recovery room for non-cardiac surgeries without craniotomy: A retrospective study using a machine learning approach.

Niklas Giesa, Stefan Haufe, Mario Menk, Björn Weiß, Claudia D Spies, Sophie K Piper, Felix Balzer, Sebastian D Boie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Niklas GiesaInstitute of Medical Informatics, Charité - Universitätmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0808-3966
Stefan HaufeInstitute of Medical Informatics, Charité - Universitätmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Mario MenkDepartment of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine (CCM, CVK), Berlin, Germany.
Björn WeißDepartment of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine (CCM, CVK), Berlin, Germany.
Claudia D SpiesDepartment of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine (CCM, CVK), Berlin, Germany.
Sophie K PiperInstitute of Medical Informatics, Charité - Universitätmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Felix BalzerInstitute of Medical Informatics, Charité - Universitätmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Sebastian D BoieInstitute of Medical Informatics, Charité - Universitätmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7993-7901

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postoperative delirium (POD) contributes to severe outcomes such as death or development of dementia. Thus, it is desirable to identify vulnerable patients in advance during the perioperative phase. Previous studies mainly investigated risk factors for delirium during hospitalization and further used a linear logistic regression (LR) approach with time-invariant data. Studies have not investigated patients' fluctuating conditions to support POD precautions. In this single-center study, we aimed to predict POD in a recovery room setting with a non-linear machine learning (ML) technique using pre-, intra-, and postoperative data. The target variable POD was defined with the Nursing Screening Delirium Scale (Nu-DESC) ≥ 1. Feature selection was conducted based on robust univariate test statistics and L1 regularization. Non-linear multi-layer perceptron (MLP) as well as tree-based models were trained and evaluated-with the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC), the area under precision recall curve (AUPRC), and additional metrics-against LR and published models on bootstrapped testing data. The prevalence of POD was 8.2% in a sample of 73,181 surgeries performed between 2017 and 2020. Significant univariate impact factors were the preoperative ASA status (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification system), the intraoperative amount of given remifentanil, and the postoperative Aldrete score. The best model used pre-, intra-, and postoperative data. The non-linear boosted trees model achieved a mean AUROC of 0.854 and a mean AUPRC of 0.418 outperforming linear LR, well as best applied and retrained baseline models. Overall, non-linear machine learning models using data from multiple perioperative time phases were superior to traditional ones in predicting POD in the recovery room. Class imbalance was seen as a main impediment for model application in clinical practice.

Identifiers

PMID39141688
PMCPMC11324157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.