Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39141675›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Taphonomic signatures of early scavenging by black and turkey vultures.

Marian L Wahl, Grant N Burcham, Amanda M Herbert, Lee A Humberg, Patrick A Zollner, Landon R Jones, Brandon M Quinby, Bryan M Kluever

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marian L WahlDepartment of Forestry and Natural Resources, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America.
Grant N BurchamHeeke Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, Dubois, Indiana, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2443-6461
Amanda M HerbertDepartment of Forestry and Natural Resources, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America.
Lee A HumbergU.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America.ORCID 0009-0003-3840-4393
Patrick A ZollnerDepartment of Forestry and Natural Resources, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8263-7029
Landon R JonesDepartment of Wildlife, Fisheries and Aquaculture, Mississippi State University, Mississippi, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1814-6115
Brandon M QuinbyDepartment of Forestry and Natural Resources, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America.
Bryan M KlueverU.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, Florida Field Station, Gainsville, Florida, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scavenging is critical for nutrient cycling and maintenance of healthy ecosystems. While there is substantial research into the identification of taphonomic signatures from facultative mammalian scavengers, early stage scavenging signatures by vultures remain unknown. Further, some vulture species are opportunistic predators, highlighting the need to define signatures observed in the course of normal scavenging behavior. We placed stillborn neonatal calves in an unoccupied pasture and used motion-trigger camera traps to quantify scavenging effort, then conducted necropsies to evaluate the effect of black vulture (Coragyps atratus) and turkey vulture (Cathartes aura) scavenging effort on carcass consumption. We measured the order of consumption of different tissue types to delineate which anatomic structures vultures consume first. Scavenging trials with higher numbers of vultures feeding on the carcass for longer were associated with decreased remaining tongue and abdominal viscera, and a larger umbilical wound. Greater maximum flock sizes were associated with decreased remaining tongue and abdominal viscera, a larger umbilical wound, and greater biomass consumption. Black vultures targeted the perineum and tongue earlier, while turkey vultures targeted the eyes, perineum, and tongue. These results are consistent with the idea that vultures prefer tissues that are easy to access and contain high nutrient content. These patterns form a distinctive taphonomic signature that can be used to identify early scavenging by black and turkey vultures. Our results demonstrate that criteria commonly used to identify livestock depredation by black vultures only document vulture presence and not predation. This distinction implies that new and more definitive criteria need to be developed and put into practice for more accurate decision criteria in livestock depredation compensation programs.

Indexed as

FalconiformesAnimalsCattleEcosystemFeeding BehaviorPredatory Behavior

Identifiers

PMID39141675
PMCPMC11324135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.