ArticlePLOS digital health2024
Personalizing the empiric treatment of gonorrhea using machine learning models.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Machine learning models in predicting antimicrobial resistance in gonorrhea: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- Laboratory evaluation of the Allplex NG & DR assay for detection ofSexually transmitted infections · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite the emergence of antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) strains of Neisseria gonorrhoeae, the treatment of gonorrhea remains empiric and according to standardized guidelines, which are informed by the national prevalence of resistant strains. Yet, the prevalence of AMR varies substantially across geographic and demographic groups. We investigated whether data from the national surveillance system of AMR gonorrhea in the US could be used to personalize the empiric treatment of gonorrhea. We used data from the Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project collected between 2000-2010 to train and validate machine learning models to identify resistance to ciprofloxacin (CIP), one of the recommended first-line antibiotics until 2007. We used these models to personalize empiric treatments based on sexual behavior and geographic location and compared their performance with standardized guidelines, which recommended treatment with CIP, ceftriaxone (CRO), or cefixime (CFX) between 2005-2006, and either CRO or CFX between 2007-2010. Compared with standardized guidelines, the personalized treatments could have replaced 33% of CRO and CFX use with CIP while ensuring that 98% of patients were prescribed effective treatment during 2005-2010. The models maintained their performance over time and across geographic regions. Predictive models trained on data from national surveillance systems of AMR gonorrhea could be used to personalize the empiric treatment of gonorrhea based on patients' basic characteristics at the point of care. This approach could reduce the unnecessary use of newer antibiotics while maintaining the effectiveness of first-line therapy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.