ArticlePLOS digital health2024
Understanding female sex workers' acceptance of secret Facebook group for HIV prevention in Cameroon.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite the widespread utilization of social media in HIV prevention interventions, little is known about the acceptance of social media in the dissemination of HIV prevention information among key at-risk groups like female sex workers (FSWs). This study has investigated FSWs' acceptance of Secret Facebook Group (SFG) in learning about HIV prevention. During June 2022, a quantitative study was conducted using a 5-star point Likert scale survey among 40 FSWs aged 18 years and older who took part in a Secret Facebook Group (SFG) HIV intervention. Descriptive statistics described demographics, social media accessibility, perceived usefulness (PU), perceived ease of use (PEOU), and acceptance among survey participants using SPSS and SAS. Most study participants found SFG utilized in HIV prevention intervention acceptable. Seventy-five percent (75%) of participants selected 5 stars for the acceptance of SFG. The majority of participants used social media, spent more than 90 minutes on social media per day, and could participate in the SFG HIV prevention intervention if airtime was not provided by study investigators, despite experiencing times when the internet was interrupted. The results also showed the PU and PEOU mean scores of SFG in the HIV prevention intervention were slightly lower than the acceptance scores (4.70 and 4.50 vs. 4.74). The data suggested future research should focus on explaining FSWs acceptance of social media and identifying social media platform alternatives for HIV prevention intervention. This study provided useful insights into social media acceptance, use, and importance in HIV prevention education among FSWs. The findings also indicate the need for further research on the reasons for acceptance of social media and relevant social media platforms supporting HIV prevention education among FSWs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.