ArticlePloS one2024
Resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus to the airway epithelium oxidative response assessed by a cell-free in vitro assay.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The antibacterial oxidative response, which relies on the production of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and hypothiocyanite (OSCN-), is a major line of defense protecting the human airway epithelium (HAE) from lesions when infected. The in vitro studies of the oxidative responses are performed mainly by one-shot H2O2 exposure that does not recapitulate the complex H2O2/LPO/SCN- system releasing the reactive oxygen species in airway secretions. A cell-free in vitro assay mimicking this system has been described but was not fully characterized. Here, we comprehensively characterized the hourly H2O2/OSCN- concentrations produced within this in vitro assay and assessed the resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus clinical strains to the HAE oxidative response. We found that H2O2/OSCN- were steadily produced from 7h and up to 25h, but OSCN- was detoxified in 15 minutes by bacteria upon exposure. Preliminary tests on PA14 showed survival rates at 1-hour post-exposure (hpe) to H2O2 of roughly 50% for 105 and 107 colony-forming unit (CFU)/mL inocula, while 102 and 104 CFU/mL inocula were cleared after one hpe. Thirteen clinical strains were then exposed, highlighting that conversely to P. aeruginosa, S. aureus showed resistance to oxidative stress independently of its antibiotic resistance phenotype. Our results demonstrated how this in vitro assay can be helpful in assessing whether pathogens can resist the antibacterial oxidative HAE response. We anticipate these findings as a starting point for more sophisticated in vitro models that could serve as high-throughput screening for molecules targeting the bacterial antioxidant response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.