Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39141387›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2024

State COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates and Uptake Among Health Care Workers in the US.

Yin Wang, Charles Stoecker, Kevin Callison, Julie H Hernandez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Protecting our frontline: vaccination policies for health care workers in the Americas.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yin WangDepartment of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Charles StoeckerDepartment of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Kevin CallisonDepartment of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Julie H HernandezDepartment of International Health and Sustainable Development, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Seventeen states introduced COVID-19 vaccine mandates for health care workers (HCWs) in mid-2021. Prior research on the effect of these mandates was centered on the nursing home sector, and more evidence is needed for their effect on the entire HCW population. Objective: To examine the association between state COVID-19 vaccine mandates for HCWs and vaccine uptake in this population. Design, Setting, and Participants: This repeated cross-sectional study included biweekly, individual-level data for adults aged 25 to 64 years who were working or volunteering in health care settings obtained from the Household Pulse Survey between May 26 and October 11, 2021. Analyses were conducted between November 2022 and October 2023. Exposure: Announcement of a state COVID-19 vaccine mandate for HCWs. Main Outcomes and Measures: An indicator for whether a sampled HCW ever received a COVID-19 vaccine and an indicator for whether an HCW completed or intended to complete the primary COVID-19 vaccination series. Event study analyses using staggered difference-in-differences methods compared vaccine uptake among HCWs in mandate and nonmandate states before and after each mandate announcement. The sample was further stratified by the availability of regular COVID-19 testing in place of a vaccination (ie, a test-out option) and by the ages of HCWs (25-49 or 50-64 years) to examine heterogeneous associations. Results: The study sample included 31 142 HCWs (mean [SD] age, 45.5 [10.6] years; 72.1% female) from 45 states, 16 of which introduced COVID-19 vaccine mandates for HCWs. Results indicated a mandate-associated 3.46-percentage point (pp) (95% CI, 0.29-6.63 pp; P = .03) increase in the proportion of HCWs ever vaccinated against COVID-19 and a 3.64-pp (95% CI, 0.72-6.57 pp; P = .02) increase in the proportion that completed or intended to complete the primary vaccination series 2 weeks after mandate announcement from baseline proportions of 87.98% and 86.12%, respectively. In the stratified analyses, positive associations were only detected in mandate states with no test-out option and among HCWs aged 25 to 49 years, which suggested vaccination increases of 3.32% to 7.09% compared with baseline proportions. Conclusions and Relevance: This repeated cross-sectional study found that state COVID-19 vaccine mandates for HCWs were associated with increased vaccine uptake among HCWs, especially among younger HCWs and those in states with no test-out option. These findings suggest the potential for vaccine mandates to further promote vaccinations in an already highly vaccinated HCW population, especially when no test-out option is in place.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesHealth PersonnelMandatory ProgramsSARS-CoV-2AdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUnited StatesVaccinationCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID39141387
PMCPMC11325213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.