ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024
An additional proofreader contributes to DNA replication fidelity in mycobacteria.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intrahost mutational dynamics parallel long-term genome evolution in endosymbionts.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Heterogeneity in microbial antibiotic responses: genetic basis and within-host evolution.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2026Review
- Long-term spatiotemporal evolution of drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis in China.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Diversity and distribution of bacterial DNA polymerases.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Hypermutability ofEmerging microbes & infections · 2025Article
- Genetic determinants ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Mycobacterium bovis frd operon phase variation hijacks succinate signaling to drive immunometabolic rewiring and pathogenicity.Nature communications · 2025Article
- An additional proofreader contributes to DNA replication fidelity in mycobacteria.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The removal of mis-incorporated nucleotides by proofreading activity ensures DNA replication fidelity. Whereas the ε-exonuclease DnaQ is a well-established proofreader in the model organism
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.