Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39141297›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024

Methods for Studying Fusion of Bacterial Extracellular Vesicles with Intact Bacteria and Host Cells.

Lydia Mathew, Shobhna Kapoor

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lydia MathewDepartment of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Shobhna KapoorDepartment of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. shobhnak@hiroshima-u.ac.jp.

Funding

DBT/Welcome Trust India Alliance Fellowship IA/I/21/1/505624DST-SERB EMR/2016/005414, AND WEA/2020/000032
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial extracellular vesicles (BEVs) are nano- or micrometer-sized membrane-bound lipid vesicles released from both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. Cellular transport, communication, pathogenesis, and host-pathogen interactions are some of the major biological processes impacted by BEVs. Among these, host-pathogen interactions and bacterial pathogenesis are emerging as highly important targetable avenues underlined by the issues of antimicrobial resistance, thus demanding novel targets and approaches to treat bacterial infections. In this aspect, the study of the interaction of BEVs with bacteria and/or host cells becomes imperative and brings the membrane fusion process to the forefront. Furthermore, membrane fusion also underscores the performance of BEVs as nano-therapeutic delivery platforms. Here, we report methods to study fusion kinetics between mycobacteria-derived extracellular vesicles, which we refer to as MEVs, and intact mycobacteria or MEVs themselves. We also discuss the isolation of MEVs and their characterization. We outline critical factors that affect fusion kinetics by MEVs. The same principle can be extended for studying fusion between BEVs and mammalian host cells important for understanding how BEVs influence host-pathogen crosstalk.

Indexed as

Extracellular VesiclesHost-Pathogen InteractionsMembrane FusionAnimalsHumansMycobacteriumBacterial extracellular vesicles (BEVs)Content leakageContent mixingFörster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET)In vitro membrane fusionMycobacterial extracellular vesicles (MEVs)

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.