Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39141202›Full record

ArticleMaternal and child health journal2024

Maternal Immunization Decision-Making Among Pregnant and Lactating People in Kenya: A Qualitative Exploration of Peer Influences on Vaccine Decision-Making for a Future RSV Vaccine.

Prachi Singh, Berhaun Fesshaye, Clarice Lee, Rosemary N Njogu, Ruth A Karron, Rupali J Limaye

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Prachi SinghDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 415 N Washington Street, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Berhaun FesshayeDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 415 N Washington Street, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Clarice LeeDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 415 N Washington Street, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Rosemary N NjoguJhpiego Kenya, 2nd Floor, Arlington Block, 12 Riverside, Off Riverside Drive, P.O. Box 66119-00800, Nairobi, Kenya.
Ruth A KarronDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Rupali J LimayeDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA. rlimaye@jhu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3883-9720

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation INV-016977
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRespiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a leading cause of respiratory illness in infants globally, with new maternal RSV vaccines on the horizon. Vaccine decision-making during pregnancy is shaped by individual, interpersonal, community, and societal factors. This study explored key interpersonal influences on maternal vaccine decision-making among pregnant and lactating people (PLP) and community members in Kenya.

methodsThis qualitative study conducted in-depth interviews with six pregnant people, 18 lactating people, and 10 community members in one rural and one urban county in Kenya. Data were analyzed using a grounded theory approach.

resultsParticipants identified the pregnant person themself, male partners, other family members, peers, and healthcare providers (HCPs) as key influences on the maternal immunization decision-making process. The majority of interviewed PLP believed that decision-making during pregnancy should be left to themselves due to autonomy and their role as the primary caregiver. Community members, including male partners, also identified pregnant people as the key decision-maker. While some PLP said they deferred to male partners to make vaccine decisions, more felt that men were not as informed on maternal and child issues as themselves or other female peers and relatives. HCPs emerged as important influences and information sources for PLP during decision-making. DISCUSSION: Understanding who influences vaccine-decision making during pregnancy will help inform demand generation strategies, and in turn, uptake of future maternal vaccines, including RSV vaccines. Given the strong role HCPs and peers have in the decision-making process, targeting key potential influences is essential to improve vaccine acceptance.

Indexed as

Decision MakingLactationQualitative ResearchRespiratory Syncytial Virus InfectionsAdultFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansImmunizationInterviews as TopicKenyaMalePatient Acceptance of Health CarePeer GroupPregnancyPregnant PeopleRespiratory Syncytial Virus VaccinesKenyaMaternal immunizationPeer influencesRespiratory syncytial virus

Identifiers

PMID39141202
PMCPMC11420282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.