ArticleClinical and experimental medicine2024
Novel method for detecting frequent TERT promoter hot spot mutations in bladder cancer samples.
Article in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Optimized digital polymerase chain reaction enables detection of telomerase reverse transcriptase C228T mutation for prognostic assessment in hepatocellular carcinoma.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter (TERTp) mutations are frequently targeted tumor markers, however, they reside in regions with high GC content, which poses challenges when examined with simple molecular techniques or even with next-generation sequencing (NGS). In bladder cancer (BC), TERTp mutations are particularly frequent, however, none of the available tools have demonstrated efficacy in detecting TERTp mutations via a simple noninvasive technique. Therefore, we developed a novel PCR-based method for the detection of the two most common TERTp mutations and demonstrated its use for the analysis of BC samples. The developed SHARD-PCR TERTp mutation detection technique requires PCR and restriction digestion steps that are easily implementable even in less well-equipped laboratories. Cell lines with known mutational status were utilized for method development. Matching urine and tumor tissue samples from BC patients were analyzed, and the results were validated by next-generation sequencing. Analysis of eighteen urine and corresponding tumor tissue samples by SHARD-PCR revealed perfect matches in sample pairs, which paralleled the corresponding NGS results: fourteen samples exhibited mutations at the -124 position, two samples showed mutations at the -146 position, and no mutations were detected in two samples. Our study serves as a proof-of-concept and is limited by its small sample size, nonetheless, it demonstrates that SHARD-PCR is a simple, economic and highly reliable method for detecting TERTp mutations, which are common in different cancer types. For bladder cancer, SHARD-PCR can be performed with the use of noninvasive samples and could replace or complement currently used techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.