ArticleOral radiology2025
Deep learning segmentation of mandible with lower dentition from cone beam CT.
Article in Oral radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07365085 (Whole Versus Segmented In-House 3D Mandibular Guides for Mandibular Reconstruction Using Free Fibular Flaps), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Whole Versus Segmented In-House 3D Mandibular Guides for Mandibular Reconstruction Using Free Fibular Flaps: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: Integrating Clinical Innovation and Workflow Optimization.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Trueness of artificial intelligence-based, manual, and global thresholding segmentation protocols for human mandibles.Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists · 2025Article
- Image-based mandibular and maxillary parcellation and annotation using computed tomography (IMPACT): a deep learning-based clinical tool for orodental dose estimation and osteoradionecrosis assessment.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Image-based Mandibular and Maxillary Parcellation and Annotation using Computer Tomography (IMPACT): A Deep Learning-based Clinical Tool for Orodental Dose Estimation and Osteoradionecrosis Assessment.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to train a 3D U-Net convolutional neural network (CNN) for mandible and lower dentition segmentation from cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans.
methodsIn an ambispective cross-sectional design, CBCT scans from two hospitals (2009-2019 and 2021-2022) constituted an internal dataset and external validation set, respectively. Manual segmentation informed CNN training, and evaluations employed Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) for volumetric accuracy. A blinded oral maxillofacial surgeon performed qualitative grading of CBCT scans and object meshes. Statistical analyses included independent t-tests and ANOVA tests to compare DSC across patient subgroups of gender, race, body mass index (BMI), test dataset used, age, and degree of metal artifact. Tests were powered for a minimum detectable difference in DSC of 0.025, with alpha of 0.05 and power level of 0.8.
results648 CBCT scans from 490 patients were included in the study. The CNN achieved high accuracy (average DSC: 0.945 internal, 0.940 external). No DSC differences were observed between test set used, gender, BMI, and race. Significant differences in DSC were identified based on age group and the degree of metal artifact. The majority (80%) of object meshes produced by both manual and automatic segmentation were rated as acceptable or higher quality.
conclusionWe developed a model for automatic mandible and lower dentition segmentation from CBCT scans in a demographically diverse cohort including a high degree of metal artifacts. The model demonstrated good accuracy on internal and external test sets, with majority acceptable quality from a clinical grader.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39141154What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.