Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39141147›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgical review2024

Advancing aneurysm management: the potential of AI and machine learning in enhancing safety and predictive accuracy.

Muzamil Akhtar, Hanzala Ahmed Farooqi, Rayyan Nabi, Hamna Hasan

Abstract readLetter
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgical review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Muzamil AkhtarGujranwala Medical College, Gujranwala, Pakistan.
Hanzala Ahmed FarooqiIslamic International Medical College, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
Rayyan NabiIslamic International Medical College, Rawalpindi, Pakistan. drrayyannabi03@gmail.com.
Hamna HasanDow University of Health Sciences, Dow Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerebral aneurysm rupture, the predominant cause of non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, underscores the need for effective treatment and early detection methods. A study in Neurosurgical Review compared microsurgical clipping to endovascular therapy in 130 patients with middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysms, finding significantly fewer serious adverse events (SAEs) and neurological complications in the endovascular group. This suggests endovascular therapy's superiority in safety and reducing complications for MCA aneurysm patients. Furthermore, a systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the diagnostic accuracy of AI algorithms in detecting cerebral aneurysms, revealing a high sensitivity but notable false-positive rates, indicating AI's potential while highlighting the need for further validation. Machine learning algorithms also showed promise in predicting cerebral aneurysm rupture risk, demonstrating reasonable sensitivity and specificity. Additionally, AI-based radiomics models are advancing rapidly, offering enhanced predictive accuracy and personalized treatment planning by analyzing imaging data to identify features indicative of aneurysm conditions. Collectively, these findings emphasize the advantages of endovascular therapy for MCA aneurysms and the emerging role of AI and machine learning in improving early detection and personalized management of cerebral aneurysms.

Indexed as

Intracranial AneurysmMachine LearningAneurysm, RupturedArtificial IntelligenceEndovascular ProceduresHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicNeurosurgical ProceduresSystematic Reviews as TopicArtificial IntelligenceCerebral aneurysmMachine learning

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.