ArticleTurkish archives of pediatrics2024
Are Medical Students and Primary Health-care Professionals Aware of Neonatal Cholestasis and Acholic Stool.
Article in Turkish archives of pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasound in Cholestatic Infants with Biliary Atresia.Turkish archives of pediatrics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early diagnosis of biliary atresia (BA) and the timing of Kasai hepatic portoenterostomy are associated with improved survival rates of the native liver. Acholic stool is a major and earliest sign of BA. We evaluated the awareness and recognition of medical students and primary health care professionals (PHCPs) about neonatal cholestasis and acholic stool as a marker of BA. The knowledge of students and PHCP about prolonged jaundice and acholic stool was evaluated through a questionnaire. In the first step, 5 questions evaluating the knowledge of prolonged jaundice were asked. The sixth question was "Have you ever seen acholic stool before?" Following this question, stool color cards with 9 colors were shown, and participants were asked "Which of the following stool pictures would you define as acholic?" A total 724 students and 88 PHCPs were included in the study. In both groups, about half of the participants could not answer the first 4questions related to prolonged jaundice and cholestasis correctly. Twenty-four percent of the students and 11.4% of PHCP answered correctly to all of the stool colors. The rate of correct answers to acholic stool colors were approximately 43.9%-87.6% and 23.9%-86.4% for students and PHCP, respectively. Whitish acholic stool colors were better known than mild yellowish pale stool colors. The percentages of recognition were less than about 50% for these stool colors. This study showed that recognition and awareness of prolonged jaundice are low, and acholic stool is not well known. This may lead to delay in diagnosis. Considering the international success of stool color cards, using stool color cards will improve the outcomes of biliary atresia in our country as well.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.