Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39140803›Full record

ArticleThe Gerontologist2024

Redefining the Successful Aging of Veterans: A Scoping Review.

Kate Hutton Burns, Barbara Barbosa Neves, Narelle Warren

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in The Gerontologist, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kate Hutton BurnsSchool of Social Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1229-8492
Barbara Barbosa NevesSydney Centre for Healthy Societies, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4490-4322
Narelle WarrenSchool of Social Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2623-4078

Funding

Australian Department of Veterans' Affairs DVA-PNL 2020-21/193
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesThe aging experiences of military veterans provide critical insights into what successful aging is and means for later life contexts constrained by distinct health and social needs. Can veterans "successfully" age when they are exposed to so many stressors with serious health and social consequences for later life? Veterans can offer valuable lessons for developing comprehensive approaches to refining successful aging, ensuring inclusivity of different older populations. Building on Rowe and Kahn's idea of successful aging, we utilize the complementary concept of "active aging" to explore if there are unique factors, characteristics, and interventions that support active aging in veterans, compared with nonveteran populations. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsA rapid review and evidence synthesis was conducted across 9 databases in medicine, psychology, anthropology, sociology, and public health to search for peer-reviewed articles and research reports.

resultsFindings suggest that programs linking health and social dimensions can support the active aging of veterans, namely interventions promoting active physical and cognitive lifestyle as well as social connectedness and engagement. Such programs and interventions help prevent and combat mental and physical health decline and increase quality of life and well-being. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Findings have implications for veteran and nonveteran populations more broadly, as people can actively age even when they have unique health and social needs.

Indexed as

AgingQuality of LifeVeteransAgedHealthy AgingHumansActive agingHealth needsInterventionsSuccessful agingVeterans

Identifiers

PMID39140803
PMCPMC11638774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.