ArticlePain2025
Visualizing the modulation of neurokinin 1 receptor-positive neurons in the superficial dorsal horn by spinal cord stimulation in vivo.
Article in Pain, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractSpinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an effective modality for pain treatment, yet its underlying mechanisms remain elusive. Neurokinin 1 receptor-positive (NK1R + ) neurons in spinal lamina I play a pivotal role in pain transmission. To enhance our mechanistic understanding of SCS-induced analgesia, we investigated how different SCS paradigms modulate the activation of NK1R + neurons, by developing NK1R-Cre;GCaMP6s transgenic mice and using in vivo calcium imaging of superficial NK1R + neurons under anesthesia (1.5% isoflurane). Neurokinin 1 receptor-positive neurons in the lumbar spinal cord (L4-5) showed a greater activation by electrical test stimulation (TS, 3.0 mA, 1 Hz) at the hindpaw at 2 weeks after tibia-sparing nerve injury (SNI-t) than in naïve mice. Spinal cord stimulation was then delivered through a bipolar plate electrode placed epidurally at L1-2 level. The short-term 50-Hz high-intensity SCS (80% motor threshold [MoT], 10 minutes) induced robust and prolonged inhibition of NK1R + neuronal responses to TS in both naïve and SNI-t mice. The 30-minute 50-Hz and 900-Hz SCS applied at moderate intensity (50% MoT) also significantly inhibited neuronal responses in SNI-t mice. However, at low intensity (20% MoT), the 30-minute 900-Hz SCS only induced persistent neuronal inhibition in naïve mice, but not in SNI-t mice. In conclusion, both 10-minute high-intensity SCS and 30-minute SCS at moderate intensity inhibit the activation of superficial NK1R + neurons, potentially attenuating spinal nociceptive transmission. Furthermore, in vivo calcium imaging of NK1R + neurons provides a new approach for exploring the spinal neuronal mechanisms of pain inhibition by neuromodulation pain therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.