Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39140419›Full record

ArticleThe Gerontologist2024

The Law, Dementia, and Sexuality-Is the Law Striking the Right Balance?

Oluwatoyin Sorinmade, Alex Ruck Keene, Carmelle Peisah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Gerontologist, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Oluwatoyin SorinmadeDepartment of Old Age Psychiatry, Kent and Medway NHS and Social Care Partnership Trust, Maidstone, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6953-8031
Alex Ruck KeeneDickson Poon School of Law, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8856-8132
Carmelle PeisahSchool of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

Applied Research Collaboration KentKent and MedwayNational Institute for Health ResearchSocial Care Partnership Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesEnglish and Welsh laws require "contemporaneous" consent to sexual relations, often precluding "non-capacituos" people living with advanced dementia from these human interactions. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsThe views of people living with dementia, carers, professionals, and over-55s were explored on implications of current laws on sexuality in dementia. Thirty-five participants from England were recruited through purposive selective sampling. Audio-taped semistructured interviews were transcribed and thematically analyzed with each stakeholder group coded separately.

resultsCommon themes across stakeholders were (i) law reform needed due to their hammer-like effect ignoring the individual; (ii) dissonant theme of needing the law for protection; (iii) negative impact of denied intimacy on individuals and partners; (iv) support for Advance Decisions on Intimacy with caveats; (v) less support for involvement of Court of Protection and Powers of Attorney; (vi) call for review of capacity concept with support for an assent model. People living with dementia described shame and stigma associated with policing of their sexuality and perception of being singled out for protection and intrusion into their lives. For informal carers (mostly wives), the theme of "what about me" emerged, demonstrating that for the long-term partnered, this is a couple's issue. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Practical implications of this study include need to address ageism and ableism; human rights education for society and professionals; starting point of presumed capacity for sexual relations with consensus on how and when this should be rebutted; and care homes' certification requirements should incorporate assessment of the relationship health of their residents.

Indexed as

CaregiversDementiaSexualityAgedAged, 80 and overEnglandFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchWalesEthicsPerson-centered careQuality of care

Identifiers

PMID39140419
PMCPMC11472172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.