ArticleAnnals of medicine2024
Dilemma in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and expectations from brain-machine interfaces.
Article in Annals of medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current status and future prospects of brain-computer interfaces in the field of neurological disease rehabilitation.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Review
- Advancements in the application of brain-computer interfaces based on different paradigms in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveWe hypothesized that patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) face a dilemma between motivation to live and difficulty in living, and brain-machine interfaces (BMIs) can reduce this dilemma. This study aimed to investigate the present situation of patients with ALS and their expectations from BMIs. MATERIALS AND
methodsOur survey design consisted of an anonymous mail-in questionnaire comprising questions regarding the use of tracheostomy positive pressure ventilation (TPPV), motivation to live, anxiety about the totally locked-in state (TLS), anxiety about caregiver burden, and expectations regarding the use of BMI. Primary outcomes were scores for motivation to live and anxiety about caregiver burden and the TLS. Outcomes were evaluated using the visual analogue scale.
resultsAmong 460 participants, 286 (62.6%) were already supported by or had decided to use TPPV. The median scores for motivation to live, anxiety about TLS, and anxiety about caregiver burden were 8.0, 9.0, and 7.0, respectively. Overall, 49% of patients intended to use BMI. Among patients who had refused TPPV, 15.9% intended to use BMI and TPPV. Significant factors for the use of BMI were motivation to live (
conclusionsThese results clearly revealed a serious dilemma among patients with ALS between motivation to live and their anxiety about TLS and caregiver burden. Patients expected BMI to reduce this dilemma. Thus, the development of better BMIs may meet these expectations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.