Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39140273›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2024

Transforming Primary Care Data Into the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model: Development and Usability Study.

Mathilde Fruchart, Paul Quindroit, Chloé Jacquemont, Jean-Baptiste Beuscart, Matthieu Calafiore, Antoine Lamer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. The impact of the Social Exposome in Cardiovascular Health and Disease.Journal of precision medicine (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mathilde FruchartUniv Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 2694 - METRICS: Évaluation des Technologies de santé et des, Pratiques médicales, 2 Place de Verdun, Lille, F-59000, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7826-0713
Paul QuindroitUniv Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 2694 - METRICS: Évaluation des Technologies de santé et des, Pratiques médicales, 2 Place de Verdun, Lille, F-59000, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0387-2413
Chloé JacquemontDépartement de Médecine Générale, University of Lille, Lille, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-7413-6057
Jean-Baptiste BeuscartUniv Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 2694 - METRICS: Évaluation des Technologies de santé et des, Pratiques médicales, 2 Place de Verdun, Lille, F-59000, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0734-8371
Matthieu CalafioreUniv Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 2694 - METRICS: Évaluation des Technologies de santé et des, Pratiques médicales, 2 Place de Verdun, Lille, F-59000, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4755-5172
Antoine LamerUniv Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 2694 - METRICS: Évaluation des Technologies de santé et des, Pratiques médicales, 2 Place de Verdun, Lille, F-59000, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9546-1808

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Patient-monitoring software generates a large amount of data that can be reused for clinical audits and scientific research. The Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI) consortium developed the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) Common Data Model (CDM) to standardize electronic health record data and promote large-scale observational and longitudinal research. Objective: This study aimed to transform primary care data into the OMOP CDM format. Methods: We extracted primary care data from electronic health records at a multidisciplinary health center in Wattrelos, France. We performed structural mapping between the design of our local primary care database and the OMOP CDM tables and fields. Local French vocabularies concepts were mapped to OHDSI standard vocabularies. To validate the implementation of primary care data into the OMOP CDM format, we applied a set of queries. A practical application was achieved through the development of a dashboard. Results: Data from 18,395 patients were implemented into the OMOP CDM, corresponding to 592,226 consultations over a period of 20 years. A total of 18 OMOP CDM tables were implemented. A total of 17 local vocabularies were identified as being related to primary care and corresponded to patient characteristics (sex, location, year of birth, and race), units of measurement, biometric measures, laboratory test results, medical histories, and drug prescriptions. During semantic mapping, 10,221 primary care concepts were mapped to standard OHDSI concepts. Five queries were used to validate the OMOP CDM by comparing the results obtained after the completion of the transformations with the results obtained in the source software. Lastly, a prototype dashboard was developed to visualize the activity of the health center, the laboratory test results, and the drug prescription data. Conclusions: Primary care data from a French health care facility have been implemented into the OMOP CDM format. Data concerning demographics, units, measurements, and primary care consultation steps were already available in OHDSI vocabularies. Laboratory test results and drug prescription data were mapped to available vocabularies and structured in the final model. A dashboard application provided health care professionals with feedback on their practice.

Indexed as

common data modeldashboarddata reusedata warehouseEHRelectronic health recordObservational Medical Outcomes Partnershippatient monitoringpatient tracking systemprimary careprimary care datareproducible research

Identifiers

PMID39140273
PMCPMC11337138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.