Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39140227›Full record

ReviewElectrophoresis2025

Food profiling goes green: Sustainable analysis strategies for food authentication.

Marina Creydt, Markus Fischer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Electrophoresis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marina CreydtHamburg School of Food Science-Institute of Food Chemistry, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2868-2838
Markus FischerHamburg School of Food Science-Institute of Food Chemistry, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

Bundesministerium für Ernährung und Landwirtschaft 2816500914
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Omics technologies, such as genomics, proteomics, metabolomics, isotopolomics, and metallomics, are important tools for analytical verification of food authenticity. However, in many cases, their application requires the use of high-resolution technological platforms as well as careful consideration of sample collection, storage, preparation and, in particular, extraction. In this overview, the individual steps and disciplines are explained against the background of the term "Green Chemistry," and the various instrumental procedures for the respective omics disciplines are discussed. Furthermore, new approaches and developments are presented on how such analyses can be made sustainable in the future.

Indexed as

Food AnalysisGreen Chemistry TechnologyGenomicsMetabolomicsProteomicsenvironmentally friendly analytical chemistryfood authenticityfood fraudomics strategiessustainable food analyses

Identifiers

PMID39140227
PMCPMC11865702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.