ArticleSmall (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)2024
Mussel-Inspired Polymer Binders for Organic Electrodes.
Article in Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- N-Doped Carbon Dots Assist Crosslinked Binder in Enhancing Ion Transport and Interface Stability of Silicon Anodes.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Article
- Solubility Challenges and Strategies for Organic Sodium-Ion Batteries: Status and Perspectives.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Article
- Mussel-Inspired Polymer Binders for Organic Electrodes.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The development of polymer binders is necessary to meet the growing demands of modern energy storage technologies. While catechol-containing materials are proven successful in silicon anodes, their application in organic batteries remains unexplored. In this contribution, the synthesis of four polymers are described with nearly identical side chain composition but varying backbone structures. The materials are used to investigate the effect of polymer backbone structure on the binding abilities of catechol-containing materials. Comparative analysis with the commonly used polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) binder aims to address two critical questions: 1) Can catechol-rich polymers replace PVDF for use in organic cathodes? and 2) Does the choice of polymer backbone affect the performance of the battery?. The investigation reveals that supramolecular interactions, such as π-π stacking and coordination bonding, are pivotal features of catechol binders. Among the catechol-rich polymers, the polyacrylate binder stands out, likely attributed to its high flexibility. Additionally, introducing an oxygen atom into a catechol-rich polynorbornene enhances lithium-ion conductivity and rate performance. Overall, the findings highlight the viability of catechol-containing polymers as organic cathode binders, and that the choice of polymer backbone is a crucial factor for their use as lithium-ion battery binder materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.