ArticleACS sensors2024
Discrimination of Microplastics and Phytoplankton Using Impedance Cytometry.
Article in ACS sensors, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A review on microplastics: sources, environmental fate, degradation pathways, and analytical identification methods.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Microfluidic Sensors for Micropollutant Detection in Environmental Matrices: Recent Advances and Prospects.Biosensors · 2025Review
- Recent Advances in Microfluidic Impedance Detection: Principle, Design and Applications.Micromachines · 2025Review
- Rapid Differentiation between Microplastic Particles Using Integrated Microwave Cytometry with 3D Electrodes.ACS sensors · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Both microplastics and phytoplankton are found together in the ocean as suspended microparticles. There is a need for deployable technologies that can identify, size, and count these particles at high throughput to monitor plankton community structure and microplastic pollution levels. In situ analysis is particularly desirable as it avoids the problems associated with sample storage, processing, and degradation. Current technologies for phytoplankton and microplastic analysis are limited in their capability by specificity, throughput, or lack of deployability. Little attention has been paid to the smallest size fraction of microplastics and phytoplankton below 10 μm in diameter, which are in high abundance. Impedance cytometry is a technique that uses microfluidic chips with integrated microelectrodes to measure the electrical impedance of individual particles. Here, we present an impedance cytometer that can discriminate and count microplastics sampled directly from a mixture of phytoplankton in a seawater-like medium in the 1.5-10 μm size range. A simple machine learning algorithm was used to classify microplastic particles based on dual-frequency impedance measurements of particle size (at 1 MHz) and cell internal electrical composition (at 500 MHz). The technique shows promise for marine deployment, as the chip is sensitive, rugged, and mass producible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.