Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39140174›Full record

ArticleTurkish archives of pediatrics2024

The Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic and Time to Diagnosis for Childhood Pulmonary Diseases: Outcomes of a Tertiary Care Center.

Meltem Akgül Erdal, Halime Nayır Büyükşahin, İsmail Güzelkaş, Birce Sunman, Didem Alboğa, Nagehan Emiralioğlu, Ebru Yalçın, Deniz Doğru, H Uğur Özçelik, Nural Kiper

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish archives of pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Meltem Akgül ErdalDepartment of Pediatric Pulmonology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye.
Halime Nayır BüyükşahinDepartment of Pediatric Pulmonology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye.
İsmail GüzelkaşDepartment of Pediatric Pulmonology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye.
Birce SunmanDepartment of Pediatric Pulmonology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye.
Didem AlboğaDepartment of Pediatric Pulmonology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye.
Nagehan EmiralioğluDepartment of Pediatric Pulmonology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye.
Ebru YalçınDepartment of Pediatric Pulmonology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye.
Deniz DoğruDepartment of Pediatric Pulmonology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye.
H Uğur ÖzçelikDepartment of Pediatric Pulmonology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye.
Nural KiperDepartment of Pediatric Pulmonology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic caused many changes in the social behaviors of individuals and the provision of health systems. Many studies revealed reductions in the number of diagnoses and delays in diagnosis time during the pandemic. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the pandemic on the time to diagnosis of major diseases of pediatric pulmonology. Newly diagnosed patients with cystic fibrosis (CF), childhood interstitial lung disease (chILD), tuberculosis (TB), and primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) were grouped into pandemic (group 1) and 2 consecutive pre-pandemic periods divided into equal intervals (groups 2 and 3). For each disease group, the time to diagnosis was compared between the specified periods. A total number of patients were 171 in this study. In the CF group, there was no statistically difference in time to diagnosis between periods. In the chILD group, there was a statistically significant difference in time to diagnosis (P = .036) between groups (group 1: 2 months, group 2: 4 months and group 3: 10.5 months) that was not originated from pandemic period. In TB group there was no statistically significant difference between groups. In the PCD group, the impact of the pandemic on the time to diagnosis could not be clarified because the time interval to diagnosis (minimum: 2 years, maximum: 16 years) exceeded the studied periods (21 months). In our study, no effect found between the pandemic and age at diagnosis or time to diagnosis in patients with PCD, chILD, CF, and TB at our center.

Identifiers

PMID39140174
PMCPMC11332556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.