Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39139984›Full record

ArticleData engineering in medical imaging : first MICCAI Workshop, DEMI 2023, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2023, Vancouver, BC, Canada, October 8, 2023, Proceedings. DEMI (Workshop) (1st : 2023 : Vancouver, B.C.)2023

Investigating Transformer Encoding Techniques to Improve Data-Driven Volume-to-Surface Liver Registration for Image-Guided Navigation.

Michael Young, Zixin Yang, Richard Simon, Cristian A Linte

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data engineering in medical imaging : first MICCAI Workshop, DEMI 2023, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2023, Vancouver, BC, Canada, October 8, 2023, Proceedings. DEMI (Workshop) (1st : 2023 : Vancouver, B.C.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael YoungChester F. Carlson Center for Imaging Science, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3738-578X
Zixin YangChester F. Carlson Center for Imaging Science, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, USA.
Richard SimonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, USA.
Cristian A LinteChester F. Carlson Center for Imaging Science, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7602-7937

Funding

Biomedical Computing and Visualization Tools for Computer-integrated Diagnostic and Therapeutic Data ScienceR35GM128877 · NIGMS · ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI Cristian A Linte · 2018 to 2026
$2.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM128877
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to limited direct organ visualization, minimally invasive interventions rely extensively on medical imaging and image guidance to ensure accurate surgical instrument navigation and target tissue manipulation. In the context of laparoscopic liver interventions, intra-operative video imaging only provides a limited field-of-view of the liver surface, with no information of any internal liver lesions identified during diagnosis using pre-procedural imaging. Hence, to enhance intra-procedural visualization and navigation, the registration of pre-procedural, diagnostic images and anatomical models featuring target tissues to be accessed or manipulated during surgery entails a sufficient accurate registration of the pre-procedural data into the intra-operative setting. Prior work has demonstrated the feasibility of neural network-based solutions for nonrigid volume-to-surface liver registration. However, view occlusion, lack of meaningful feature landmarks, and liver deformation between the pre- and intra-operative settings all contribute to the difficulty of this registration task. In this work, we leverage some of the state-of-the-art deep learning frameworks to implement and test various network architecture modifications toward improving the accuracy and robustness of volume-to-surface liver registration. Specifically, we focus on the adaptation of a transformer-based segmentation network for the task of better predicting the optimal displacement field for nonrigid registration. Our results suggest that one particular transformer-based network architecture-UTNet-led to significant improvements over baseline performance, yielding a mean displacement error on the order of 4 mm across a variety of datasets.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyMachine LearningNeural NetworkNonrigid RegistrationTransformer

Identifiers

PMID39139984
PMCPMC11318296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.