Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39139982›Full record

ReviewHealth equity2024

Getting Ours? "Girlbossing" and the Ethics of Nurse Reimbursement Models.

Danisha Jenkins, Jennifer Cohen, Rae Walker, Patrick McMurray, Jess Dillard Wright

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health equity, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Danisha JenkinsSchool of Nursing, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6365-152X
Jennifer CohenDepartment of Global and Intercultural Studies, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio, USA.
Rae WalkerElaine Marieb College of Nursing, UMass Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA.
Patrick McMurraySchool of Nursing, University of North Carolina, Cary, North Carolina, USA.
Jess Dillard WrightElaine Marieb College of Nursing, UMass Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This article politicizes a reimbursement model proposed by some professional nursing associations that aim to better align the price of nursing labor (nurses' pay) to the value of nursing and make nurses' contributions more visible. Methods: Using the concept of "missing care," the critique reveals how professionalization directs attention to individual-level interactions between care seekers and practitioners while obscuring from view the harm inflicted by social institutions and structures constitutive of a capitalist political economy and the related carceral state. Results: Direct reimbursement models render practitioners complicit in the harms perpetrated and perpetuated by the health care industrial complex while professionalization processes are deployed to reduce cognitive dissonance (and moral injury) produced by combining harm with nursing's normative principles. Discussion: We describe and trace the complementary capitalist imperatives of extraction-based profit maximization and efficiency through the health care industrial complex to demonstrate how formative those imperatives are of the health care system, care-seekers' outcomes, nurses' experiences, nonconsensual modes of data collection, and surveillance. Conclusion: The naturalization of racial capitalism and the precarity and violence it entails foreclose the creation of ethical alternatives that prioritize well-being instead of the pursuit of profit that could bring the provision of and payment for care closer to the normative principles held by practitioners.

Indexed as

capitalismnurse reimbursementnursing industrial complexreimbursement

Identifiers

PMID39139982
PMCPMC11319852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.