ArticleJournal of arrhythmia2024
Clinical differences between drug-induced type 1 Brugada pattern and syndrome.
Article in Journal of arrhythmia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- How to demonstrate drug-induced Type 1 Brugada pattern electrocardiogram.Journal of arrhythmia · 2024Article
- Clinical differences between drug-induced type 1 Brugada pattern and syndrome.Journal of arrhythmia · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Diagnosis of Brugada syndrome (BrS) may be established by exposing a Type 1 Brugada pattern using a sodium channel blocker. Data on the outcomes of different patient populations with drug-induced Type 1 Brugada pattern are limited. The present study reports on the characteristics and outcome of subjects with ajmaline induced Type 1 Brugada pattern. Methods: A multicenter retrospective study including all consecutive cases of ajmaline-induced Type 1 Brugada pattern from seven centers. Results: A total of 260 patients (69.9% males, mean age 43.4 ± 13.5) were included. Additional characteristics included history of syncope ( Conclusion: Less than half of subjects with ajmaline-induced Brugada pattern met current criteria for BrS. These individuals had very low rate of adverse outcomes during a follow up of 3 years, irrespective of the indication for the test or eligibility for the BrS diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.