ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2024
Laser-assisted Abdominoplasty Marking to Achieve a Better Design of Abdominal Scar.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ensuring bilateral symmetry when marking for abdominoplasty incision is critical and can be challenging when using traditional landmarks. This study aims to compare the outcomes of laser-assisted abdominoplasty marking to the traditional method. In this prospective study, patients undergoing standard abdominoplasty were included. Abdomens were randomized to determine which half would serve as the dominant side for clinical marking. Marking was first performed using a traditional method and then using a laser level, and any differences were recorded. A total of 50 patients participated in the study. The distance between markings at the most lateral point was as high as 10.0 [7.0-10.0] mm (
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.