Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39139788›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024

CO

Zheng Li, Ao Wang, Mingqiong Zhu, Na Zhou, Li Liu, Qiaolian Li, Guoping Kuang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zheng LiDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First People's Hospital of Chenzhou, Chenzhou, Hunan, China.
Ao WangDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First People's Hospital of Chenzhou, Chenzhou, Hunan, China.
Mingqiong ZhuDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First People's Hospital of Chenzhou, Chenzhou, Hunan, China.
Na ZhouDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First People's Hospital of Chenzhou, Chenzhou, Hunan, China.
Li LiuDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First People's Hospital of Chenzhou, Chenzhou, Hunan, China.
Qiaolian LiDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First People's Hospital of Chenzhou, Chenzhou, Hunan, China.
Guoping KuangShenzhen Aier Eye Hospital affiliated to Jinan University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To explore the efficiency and safety of carbon dioxide (CO Methods: This retrospective study consisted of 16 eyes from 16 patients with glaucoma secondary to vitrectomy who underwent CLASS and were followed up for 12 months. Main outcome measures included preoperative and postoperative intraocular pressure, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), number of anti-glaucoma medications, and postoperative surgical success rate and complications. Results: The postoperative IOP and number of anti-glaucoma medications used at all follow-up time point were significantly lower than those preoperatively. The difference in BCVA was not significant before and after surgery. The main complicatios were peripheral anterior synechiae (PAS) and scleral reservoir reduction, which were controlled after neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) laser, 2 (12.50%) patients underwent re-operation. The complete and total success rates at 12 months were 68.75% and 87.50%, respectively. Conclusion: CLASS is a safe and effective procedure for Chinese patients with glaucoma secondary to vitrectomy. PAS and scleral reservoir reduction is a major contributor to postoperative IOP elevation, and trabecular minimally invasive perforation with the Nd:YAG laser is effective in lowering IOP and increasing scleral cistern volume.

Indexed as

CO2 laserdeep sclerectomyNd:YAG laserPASpost-vitrectomysecondary glaucoma

Identifiers

PMID39139788
PMCPMC11319287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.