Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39139782›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and ecotechnology2024

Optimizing air quality and health Co-benefits of mitigation technologies in China: An integrated assessment.

Mengdan Zhao, Yang Xie, Meng Xu, Zhixiong Weng, Tatsuya Hanaoka, Yuqiang Zhang, Dan Tong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and ecotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mengdan ZhaoSchool of Economics and Management, Beihang University, Beijing, 100191, China.
Yang XieSchool of Economics and Management, Beihang University, Beijing, 100191, China.
Meng XuSchool of Management, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan, 430205, China.
Zhixiong WengInstitute of Circular Economy, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, China.
Tatsuya HanaokaCenter for Social and Environmental Systems Research, National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, 305 8506, Japan.
Yuqiang ZhangEnvironment Research Institute, Shandong University, Qingdao, Shandong, 266237, China.
Dan TongMinistry of Education Key Laboratory for Earth System Modelling, Department of Earth System Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carbon mitigation technologies lead to air quality improvement and health co-benefits, while the practical effects of the technologies are dependent on the energy composition, technological advancements, and economic development. In China, mitigation technologies such as end-of-pipe treatment, renewable energy adoption, carbon capture and storage (CCS), and sector electrification demonstrate significant promise in meeting carbon reduction targets. However, the optimization of these technologies for maximum co-benefits remains unclear. Here, we employ an integrated assessment model (AIM/enduse, CAM-chem, IMED|HEL) to analyze air quality shifts and their corresponding health and economic impacts at the provincial level in China within the two-degree target. Our findings reveal that a combination of end-of-pipe technology, renewable energy utilization, and electrification yields the most promising results in air quality improvement, with a reduction of fine particulate matter (PM

Indexed as

2-Degree targetAir pollutionEconomic impactsHealth co-benefitsMitigation technology

Identifiers

PMID39139782
PMCPMC11321320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.