ReviewJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2024
State of the art of sepsis care for the emergency medicine clinician.
Review in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Monocyte Distribution Width for Sepsis Diagnosis in the Emergency Department and Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Pooled it
- The Clinical and Economic Value of Incorporating Monocyte Distribution Width Testing in the Detection of Occult Sepsis.Journal of health economics and outcomes research · 2026Article
- Mixed Shock due to Sepsis and Anaphylactic Reaction With Kounis Syndrome Secondary to Dipyrone (Metamizole): Case Report.Case reports in critical care · 2026Article
- Sepsis Resuscitation: Time to Embrace a Restrictive Fluid Strategy?Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2025Article
- State of the art of sepsis care for the emergency medicine clinician.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sepsis impacts 1.7 million Americans annually. It is a life-threatening disruption of organ function because of the body's host response to infection. Sepsis remains a condition frequently encountered in emergency departments (ED) with an estimated 850,000 annual visits affected by sepsis each year in the United States. The pillars of managing sepsis remain timely identification, initiation of antimicrobials while aiming for source control and resuscitation with a goal of restoring tissue perfusion. The focus herein is current evidence and best practice recommendations for state-of-the-art sepsis care that begins in the ED.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.