ArticleInfection and drug resistance2024
A Nomogram for Predicting the Effectiveness of Consultations on Multi-Drug Resistant Infections: An Exploration for Clinical Pharmacy Services.
Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between MDROs colonization and subsequent infections in ICU patients: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of a Nomogram to Predict Multidrug-Resistant Organism Infection in Severe Pneumonia: A Retrospective Cohort Study.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
- Epidemiology and Risk Prediction Model of Multidrug-Resistant Organism Infections After Liver Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center Cohort Study.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The Impact of Clinical Pharmacist Consultation on the Treatment of Multi-Drug Resistant Organisms (MDRO) Infections: A Retrospective Observational Study.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The increasing multi-drug resistance (MDR) is a serious threat to human health. The appropriate use of antibiotics can control the progression of MDR and clinical pharmacists play an important role in the rational use of antibiotics. There are many factors that influence the effectiveness of multi-drug resistant organisms (MDRO) infection consultations. The study aimed to establish a model to predict the outcome of consultation and explore ways to improve clinical pharmacy services. Patients and methods: Patients diagnosed with MDRO infection and consulted by clinical pharmacists were included. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to identify independent risk factors for MDRO infection consultation effectiveness, and then a nomogram was constructed and validated. Results: 198 patients were finally included. The number of underlying diseases (OR=1.720, 95% CI: 1.260-2.348), whether surgery was performed prior to infection (OR=8.853, 95% CI: 2.668-29.373), ALB level (OR=0.885, 95% CI: 0.805~0.974), pharmacist title (OR=3.463, 95% CI: 1.277~9.396) and whether the recommendation was taken up (OR=0.117, 95% CI: 0.030~0.462) were identified as independent influences on the effectiveness of the consultation. The nomogram prediction model was successfully constructed and the AUC of the training set and the verification set were 0.849 (95% CI: 0.780-0.917) and 0.761 (95% CI: 0.616-0.907) respectively. The calibration curves exhibited good overlap between the data predicted by the model and the actual data. Conclusion: A nomogram model was developed to predict the risk of consultation failure and was shown to be good accuracy and good prediction efficiency, which can provide proactive interventions to improve outcomes for potentially treatment ineffective patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.