ArticleGynecologic oncology reports2024
Association between metabolic syndrome and cervical cancer among women in Southwestern Uganda: A case-control study.
Article in Gynecologic oncology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: To determine the association between MetS and its components with cervical cancer among women in South-western Uganda. Methods: We conducted an unmatched case-control study on 470 participants in a 1:2 case-to-control ratio among women in southwestern Uganda. We recruited 157 women with cervical cancer as cases and 313 women without cervical cancer as controls at the Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital Cervical Cancer Clinic. We assessed for MetS using the National Cholesterol Education Programme Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP III) criteria. We used a multivariable binary logistic regression analysis to determine the association between MetS and its components with cervical cancer adjusted for potential confounders. We reported the adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Cases were significantly older than controls: 52.4 ± 13.15 versus 41.9 ± 11.9 respectively, p < 0.001. We found MetS was independently associated with cervical cancer (aOR 1.66; 95 % CI 1.07-2.57). Age ≥ 50 years (aOR-2.20; 95 % CI 1.35-3.56), HIV infection (aOR 2.51, 95 % CI 1.56-4.05), increasing parity (aOR 1.16, 95 % CI 1.06-1.26), and a lack of formal education (aOR 6.41, 95 % CI, 1.33-30.86) were also associated with cervical cancer. However, none of the components of MetS was associated with cervical cancer. Conclusion: In Ugandan women, MetS was associated with a higher likelihood of cervical cancer. We, therefore recommend combined screening for MetS and cervical cancer in order to reduce morbidity and mortality from both Mets and cervical cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.