ArticleAsian journal of urology2024
Analysis of the urethral stricture score and patient-related factors as predictors of outcomes following oral mucosal graft urethroplasty.
Article in Asian journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Re-stricture after buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Acta cirurgica brasileira · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The complexity of urethral strictures can predict outcomes following urethroplasty. The previously described urethral stricture score (U score) considered only stricture-related factors to grade the complexity of urethral strictures and to predict recurrence post urethroplasty, but not considered patient-related factors for the same. We aimed to study the correlation of both of these factors to the outcomes of oral mucosal graft urethroplasty. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data of 101 patients who underwent oral mucosal graft urethroplasty in our institute with a minimum follow-up of 6 months. Baseline patient characteristics and stricture-related parameters were noted. The U score was calculated for all patients which consisted of the length, location, number, and etiology of stricture. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to determine significant risk factors of recurrence. Results: The mean follow-up of patients was 15 months. Recurrence was seen in 28 patients and the mean time for detection of recurrence was 8 months of follow-up. The Charlson Comorbidity Index, history of previous intervention, length of strictures, location of strictures, number of strictures, history of smoking, and etiology were independent predictors of recurrence following urethroplasty. Based on these parameters, we formulated the modified U score (MU score). The scores ranged from 0 to 6 and a score of >2 was found to be predictive of recurrence. On comparing receiver operating characteristic curves for both scores by the DeLong test, the MU score had larger area under the curve than the U score. Conclusion: The MU scoring system is the first of its kind attempt taking into consideration both patient- and stricture-related factors to predict recurrence following oral mucosal graft urethroplasty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.