Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39139516›Full record

ArticleJournal of oral biology and craniofacial research

Computerised assessment-a novel approach for calculation of percentage of hypomineralized lesion on incisors and its correlation with aesthetic concern.

Manojkumar Jaiswal, Umer Mukhtar, Kaushlesh Singh Shakya, Amit Laddi, L Akash Singha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Which diagnostic tools and criteria to use for diagnosis of HSPM and MIH? A systematic review.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Manojkumar JaiswalA Unit of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Oral Health Sciences Center, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Umer MukhtarA Unit of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Oral Health Sciences Center, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Kaushlesh Singh ShakyaAcademy of Scientific & Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad, India.
Amit LaddiCSIR-Central Scientific Instruments Organisation, Chandigarh, India.
L Akash SinghaA Unit of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Oral Health Sciences Center, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Molar-incisor hypomineralization (MIH) is a localized, qualitative, demarcated enamel defect that affects first permanent molars (FPMs) and/or permanent incisors. The aim of present study was to introduce a novel computerised assessment process to detect and quantify the percentage opacity associated with MIH affected maxillary central incisors. Methodology: Children (8-16 years) enrolled in the primary study having mild (white/cream or yellow/brown) MIH lesion on fully erupted maxillary permanent central incisor. 50 standardised images of MIH lesions were captured in an artificially lit room with fixed parameters and were anonymized and securely stored. Images were analysed by AI-driven computerised software and generates output classifications via a sophisticated algorithm crafted using a meticulously annotated image dataset as reference through supervised machine learning (SML). For the validation of computerised assessment of MIH lesions, the percentage of demarked opacity was calculated using Results: The percentage of MIH lesion was calculated through histogram plotting with the maxima ranging from 7.29 % to 71.21 % with the mean value of 34.51 %. The validation score ranged from 10.29 % to 67.27 % with the mean value of 35.32 %. The difference between the two was statistically not significant. Out of 50 patients; 11 patients had 1-30 % of surface affected with MIH and 2 had aesthetic concern; 24 had 30-60 % of surface affected and 13 had aesthetic concern; 15 had >60 % of surface affected and 12 had aesthetic concerns. Conclusions: The proposed approach exhibit sufficient quality to be integrated into a dental software addressing practical challenges encountered in daily clinical settings.

Indexed as

AestheticsArtificial intelligenceMIH lesionOpacity calculation

Identifiers

PMID39139516
PMCPMC11320481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.