ArticleInternational journal of particle therapy2024
Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy as Single Vocal Cord Irradiation for Early-Stage Glottic Cancer.
Article in International journal of particle therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Stereotactic body radiotherapy for early glottic cancers: Is this "The Way"?Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Single vocal cord irradiation (SVCI) is a promising technique to maintain excellent oncologic control and potentially improve upon toxicities for treatment of early-stage glottic squamous cell carcinomas. We sought to investigate whether pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy could improve upon the already favorable dose gradients demonstrated with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) SVCI. Patients and Methods: A 64-year-old gentleman was treated in our department with 6X-flattening filter-free VMAT SVCI to 58.08 Gy in 16 fractions for a T1a well-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma of the left true vocal cord and tolerated it well with good local control. Comparative PBS plans were created in Raystation for the Varian ProBeam with clinical target volume (CTVs) generated to mimic the prescription target volume extent of the VMAT planning target volumes when accounting for PBS plan robustness (±3 mm translational shifts, 3.5% density perturbation). A 3-field single-field optimization plan was selected as dosimetrically preferable. Dosimetric variables were compared. Results: Several organs at risk doses improved with PBS, including the maximum and mean dose to ipsilateral carotids, maximum and mean dose to contralateral carotid, maximum dose to the spinal cord, maximum and mean dose to inferior constrictor/cricopharyngeus, maximum and mean dose to the uninvolved vocal cord, and mean dose to the thyroid gland. There are tradeoffs in skin dose depending on location relative to the target-with the highest and lowest isodoses extending more into the skin with the VMAT plan but with the moderate isodose lines covering a wider area with the PBS plan, but we deemed it tolerable regardless. Conclusion: SVCI is a promising strategy for maintaining the oncologic effectiveness of whole-larynx photon radiation while potentially improving upon the historic toxicity profile. The favorable dose distribution with PBS with respect to organs at risk dosimetry for PBS may allow for further improvements upon VMAT SVCI strategies. Clinical implementation of PBS SVCI may be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.