Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39139466›Full record

ArticleF1000Research2024

How the COVID-19 pandemic changed stakeholder engagement processes in sustainability research in the long-term.

Diana Süsser, Amanda Schibline, Andrzej Ceglarz, Johan Lilliestam, Vassilis Stavrakas, Pia-Johanna Schweizer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in F1000Research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Diana SüsserInstitute for European Energy and Climate Policy, Amsterdam, 1043GR, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9757-3491
Amanda SchiblineRenewables Grid Initiative, Berlin, 12101, Germany.
Andrzej CeglarzRenewables Grid Initiative, Berlin, 12101, Germany.
Johan LilliestamSustainability Transition Policy, Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Nürnberg, 90403, Germany.
Vassilis StavrakasΤechnoeconomics of Energy Systems laboratory (TEESlab), Department of Industrial Management and Technology, University of Piraeus, Piraeus, 18534, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1073-4561
Pia-Johanna SchweizerResearch Institute for Sustainability, Helmholtz Centre Potsdam, Potsdam, 14467, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic affected stakeholder engagement in sustainability research projects in many ways. But which effects appear permanent today, after the pandemic ended? Methods: To address this, we interviewed researchers and stakeholders and carried out a survey among European sustainability research projects in 2022. Results: We find that the pandemic years disrupted stakeholder-based research, also with lasting effects. The forced shift to online modes showed how digital engagement can bring benefits in terms of easier and more efficient stakeholder engagement, but also that important aspects are lost, particularly regarding intensity of collaboration and depth of insights. Whether to go online or stay offline depends largely on the research objective, which stakeholders to involve, and how well researchers and stakeholders already know each other. Most researchers and stakeholders want to continue online collaboration in the long term, especially those with positive online collaboration experiences from the pandemic years. Conclusions: The pandemic has a long-term impact on stakeholder engagement in research; online engagement cannot replace all benefit of previous in-person interactions with stakeholders, but it has led to digital innovations and expanded the engagement portfolio. Our research has provided qualitative insights into the impact of the pandemic on stakeholder engagement in various sustainability research projects and the implications for the long-term future that are relevant to researchers and funding agencies.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsSARS-CoV-2Stakeholder ParticipationHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesCOVID-19EUstakeholder engagementsustainability research

Identifiers

PMID39139466
PMCPMC11320055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.