ArticleHealth science reports2024
Effective process quality control management for constipation prevention in hospitalized patients with acute coronary syndrome: An observational study.
Article in Health science reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Administration of polyethylene glycol in critically ill patients with acute myocardial infarction: a retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025Article
- Dietary inflammation and socioeconomic status mediate depression-constipation link: a cross-sectional analysis of NHANES 2005-2010.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Effective process quality control management for constipation prevention in hospitalized patients with acute coronary syndrome: An observational study.Health science reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of monitoring and managing process quality control indicators in the prevention of constipation among hospitalized patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Methods: A total of 512 hospitalized patients diagnosed with ACS between January and June 2022 were screened for inclusion in the study. Ultimately, 456 eligible participants were enrolled and divided into two groups based on the chronological order of admission: the control group and the observation group. Upon admission, both groups of patients received routine constipation prevention measures in the department. However, the observation group was subjected to targeted process quality control management, which included monitoring and managing five indicators related to constipation prevention: correctness of bowel movement recording; usage rate of laxatives; execution rate of physical interventions; implementation rate of constipation prevention education; completion rate of dietary structure and habit assessments. Data were analyzed using SPSS, with Results: In comparison to the control group, the observation group demonstrated significant advantages in terms of constipation incidence, completion rates of the five process quality control indicators, occurrence rates of adverse cardiac events during defecation, and PHQ-9 scores before discharge. These disparities demonstrated statistical significance with a Conclusion: Target-oriented process quality control management is shown to be effective in reducing constipation incidence and adverse cardiac events during constipation episodes, as well as alleviating depressive symptoms among ACS patients, thus providing a safe and effective approach to constipation prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.