Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39139458›Full record

ArticleJHEP reports : innovation in hepatology2024

AI-derived body composition parameters as prognostic factors in patients with HCC undergoing TACE in a multicenter study.

Lukas Müller, Aline Mähringer-Kunz, Timo Alexander Auer, Uli Fehrenbach, Bernhard Gebauer, Johannes Haubold, Benedikt Michael Schaarschmidt, Moon-Sung Kim, René Hosch, Felix Nensa and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Lukas MüllerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Aline Mähringer-KunzDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Timo Alexander AuerDepartment of Radiology, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Uli FehrenbachDepartment of Radiology, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Bernhard GebauerDepartment of Radiology, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Johannes HauboldDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Benedikt Michael SchaarschmidtDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Moon-Sung KimInstitute for AI in Medicine (IKIM), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
René HoschDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Felix NensaDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Jens KleesiekInstitute for AI in Medicine (IKIM), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Thierno D DialloDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Freiburg University Hospital, Freiburg, Germany.
Michel EisenblätterDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Freiburg University Hospital, Freiburg, Germany.
Hanna KuziorDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Freiburg University Hospital, Freiburg, Germany.
Natascha RoehlenDepartment of Medicine II, Freiburg University Hospital, Freiburg, Germany.
Dominik BettingerDepartment of Medicine II, Freiburg University Hospital, Freiburg, Germany.
Verena SteinleDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Philipp MayerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
David ZopfsDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Daniel Pinto Dos SantosDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Roman KloecknerInstitute of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein - Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background & Aims: Body composition assessment (BCA) parameters have recently been identified as relevant prognostic factors for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Herein, we aimed to investigate the role of BCA parameters for prognosis prediction in patients with HCC undergoing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). Methods: This retrospective multicenter study included a total of 754 treatment-naïve patients with HCC who underwent TACE at six tertiary care centers between 2010-2020. Fully automated artificial intelligence-based quantitative 3D volumetry of abdominal cavity tissue composition was performed to assess skeletal muscle volume (SM), total adipose tissue (TAT), intra- and intermuscular adipose tissue, visceral adipose tissue, and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) on pre-intervention computed tomography scans. BCA parameters were normalized to the slice number of the abdominal cavity. We assessed the influence of BCA parameters on median overall survival and performed multivariate analysis including established estimates of survival. Results: Univariate survival analysis revealed that impaired median overall survival was predicted by low SM ( Conclusions: SM is an independent prognostic factor for survival prediction. Thus, the integration of SM into novel scoring systems could potentially improve survival prediction and clinical decision-making. Fully automated approaches are needed to foster the implementation of this imaging biomarker into daily routine. Impact and implications: Body composition assessment parameters, especially skeletal muscle volume, have been identified as relevant prognostic factors for many diseases and treatments. In this study, skeletal muscle volume has been identified as an independent prognostic factor for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing transarterial chemoembolization. Therefore, skeletal muscle volume as a metaparameter could play a role as an opportunistic biomarker in holistic patient assessment and be integrated into decision support systems. Workflow integration with artificial intelligence is essential for automated, quantitative body composition assessment, enabling broad availability in multidisciplinary case discussions.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBody CompositionHepatocellular CarcinomaTransarterial Chemoembolization

Identifiers

PMID39139458
PMCPMC11321290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.