ArticleFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2024
Correspondence between multiple signaling and developmental cellular patterns: a computational perspective.
Article in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- PriorCCI: Interpretable Deep Learning Framework for Identifying Key Ligand-Receptor Interactions Between Specific Cell Types from Single-Cell Transcriptomes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The spatial arrangement of variant phenotypes during stem cell division plays a crucial role in the self-organization of cell tissues. The patterns observed in these cellular assemblies, where multiple phenotypes vie for space and resources, are largely influenced by a mixture of different diffusible chemical signals. This complex process is carried out within a chronological framework of interplaying intracellular and intercellular events. This includes receiving external stimulants, whether secreted by other individuals or provided by the environment, interpreting these environmental signals, and incorporating the information to designate cell fate. Here, given two distinct signaling patterns generated by Turing systems, we investigated the spatial distribution of differentiating cells that use these signals as external cues for modifying the production rates. By proposing a computational map, we show that there is a correspondence between the multiple signaling and developmental cellular patterns. In other words, the model provides an appropriate prediction for the final structure of the differentiated cells in a multi-signal, multi-cell environment. Conversely, when a final snapshot of cellular patterns is given, our algorithm can partially identify the signaling patterns that influenced the formation of the cellular structure, provided that the governing dynamic of the signaling patterns is already known.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.