ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2024
Red Blood Cell Transfusion Strategies in Cardiovascular Interventions.
Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in heart failure and myeloproliferative neoplasms: clinical applications and risk scores - a narrative review.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute coronary syndrome, cardiac surgery, and cardiac structural interventions are among the most common situations leading to allogeneic red blood cell consumption due to the prevalence of bleeding and anemia. The wide variability in the use of transfusions derives from the current lack of data, and the absence of strong evidence and clear guideline recommendations. The current approach is to avoid unnecessary blood transfusions and limit their use to life-saving conditions; this conservative strategy derives from often controversial and inconclusive results of observational and randomized studies where liberal and restricted red blood transfusion strategies seemed to have similar outcomes. The pivotal question for future research lies in elucidating whether blood transfusions function as an active participant or merely a catalyst in amplifying adverse events. The present review aims to summarize the current literature data and critically analyze the available evidence for red blood transfusions in cardiac interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.