Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39139285›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024

Improving the response to lenvatinib in partial responders using a Constrained-Disorder-Principle-based second-generation artificial intelligence-therapeutic regimen: a proof-of-concept open-labeled clinical trial.

Tal Sigawi, Ram Gelman, Ofra Maimon, Amal Yossef, Nila Hemed, Samuel Agus, Marc Berg, Yaron Ilan, Aron Popovtzer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tal SigawiDepartment of Medicine, Hadassah Medical Center, and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.
Ram GelmanDepartment of Medicine, Hadassah Medical Center, and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.
Ofra MaimonSharett Institute of Oncology, Hebrew University, Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Amal YossefSharett Institute of Oncology, Hebrew University, Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Nila HemedDepartment of Medicine, Hadassah Medical Center, and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.
Samuel AgusOberon Sciences, Kfar Tavor, Israel.
Marc BergArea9, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Yaron Ilan *Department of Medicine, Hadassah Medical Center, and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.
Aron Popovtzer *Sharett Institute of Oncology, Hebrew University, Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The main obstacle in treating cancer patients is drug resistance. Lenvatinib treatment poses challenges due to loss of response and the common dose-limiting adverse events (AEs). The Constrained-disorder-principle (CDP)-based second-generation artificial intelligence (AI) systems introduce variability into treatment regimens and offer a potential strategy for enhancing treatment efficacy. This proof-of-concept clinical trial aimed to assess the impact of a personalized algorithm-controlled therapeutic regimen on lenvatinib effectiveness and tolerability. Methods: A 14-week open-label, non-randomized trial was conducted with five cancer patients receiving lenvatinib-an AI-assisted application tailored to a personalized therapeutic regimen for each patient, which the treating physician approved. The study assessed changes in tumor response through FDG-PET-CT and tumor markers and quality of life via the EORTC QLQ-THY34 questionnaire, AEs, and laboratory evaluations. The app monitored treatment adherence. Results: At 14 weeks of follow-up, the disease control rate (including the following outcomes: complete response, partial response, stable disease) was 80%. The FDG-PET-CT scan-based RECIST v1.1 and PERCIST criteria showed partial response in 40% of patients and stable disease in an additional 40% of patients. One patient experienced a progressing disease. Of the participants with thyroid cancer, 75% showed a reduction in thyroglobulin levels, and 60% of all the participants showed a decrease in neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio during treatment. Improvement in the median social support score among patients utilizing the system supports an ancillary benefit of the intervention. No grade 4 AEs or functional deteriorations were recorded. Summary: The results of this proof-of-concept open-labeled clinical trial suggest that the CDP-based second-generation AI system-generated personalized therapeutic recommendations may improve the response to lenvatinib with manageable AEs. Prospective controlled studies are needed to determine the efficacy of this approach.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedrug-resistant cancerlenvatinibsalivary gland cancerthyroid cancer

Identifiers

PMID39139285
PMCPMC11319816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.