Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39139256›Full record

ArticlePolish journal of radiology2024

Leveraging smart image processing techniques for early detection of foot ulcers using a deep learning network.

Garima Verma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polish journal of radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Use of thermal imaging in the detection of the diabetic foot- review.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Garima VermaSchool of Computing, DIT University, Dehradun, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To detect foot ulcers in diabetic patients by analysing thermal images of the foot using a deep learning model and estimate the effectiveness of the proposed model by comparing it with some existing studies. Material and methods: Open-source thermal images were used for the study. The dataset consists of two types of images of the feet of diabetic patients: normal and abnormal foot images. The dataset contains 1055 total images; among these, 543 are normal foot images, and the others are images of abnormal feet of the patient. The study's dataset was converted into a new and pre-processed dataset by applying canny edge detection and watershed segmentation. This pre-processed dataset was then balanced and enlarged using data augmentation, and after that, for prediction, a deep learning model was applied for the diagnosis of an ulcer in the foot. After applying canny edge detection and segmentation, the pre-processed dataset can enhance the model's performance for correct predictions and reduce the computational cost. Results: Our proposed model, utilizing ResNet50 and EfficientNetB0, was tested on both the original dataset and the pre-processed dataset after applying edge detection and segmentation. The results were highly promising, with ResNet50 achieving 89% and 89.1% accuracy for the two datasets, respectively, and EfficientNetB0 surpassing this with 96.1% and 99.4% accuracy for the two datasets, respectively. Conclusions: Our study offers a practical solution for foot ulcer detection, particularly in situations where expert analysis is not readily available. The efficacy of our models was tested using real images, and they outperformed other available models, demonstrating their potential for real-world application.

Indexed as

canny edge detectiondeep learning modeldiabeteswatershed segmentation

Identifiers

PMID39139256
PMCPMC11321030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.