Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39139235›Full record

ArticleRSC advances2024

Coupling of droplet-on-demand microfluidcs with ESI/MS to study single-cell catalysis.

Marie van der Loh, Marie Schiffmann, Matthias Polack, Konstantin Wink, Detlev Belder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RSC advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marie van der LohInstitute of Analytical Chemistry, Leipzig University Linnéstraße 3 04103 Leipzig Germany belder@uni-leipzig.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6146-7876
Marie SchiffmannInstitute of Analytical Chemistry, Leipzig University Linnéstraße 3 04103 Leipzig Germany belder@uni-leipzig.de.
Matthias PolackInstitute of Analytical Chemistry, Leipzig University Linnéstraße 3 04103 Leipzig Germany belder@uni-leipzig.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3196-645X
Konstantin WinkInstitute of Analytical Chemistry, Leipzig University Linnéstraße 3 04103 Leipzig Germany belder@uni-leipzig.de.
Detlev BelderInstitute of Analytical Chemistry, Leipzig University Linnéstraße 3 04103 Leipzig Germany belder@uni-leipzig.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6295-8706

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Droplet microfluidics provides an efficient method for analysing reactions within the range of nanoliters to picoliters. However, the sensitive, label-free and versatile detection with ESI/MS poses some difficulties. One challenge is the difficult association of droplets with the MS signal in high-throughput droplet analysis. Hence, a droplet-on-demand system for the generation of a few droplets can address this and other problems such as surfactant concentration or cross-contamination. Accordingly, the system has been further developed for online coupling with ESI/MS. To achieve this, we developed a setup enabling on-demand droplet generation by hydrodynamic gating, with downstream microscopic droplet detection and MS analysis. This facilitated the incorporation of 1-9 yeast cells into individual 1-5 nL droplets and the monitoring of yeast-catalysed transformation from ketoester to ethyl-3-hydroxybutyrate by MS. With our method a mean production rate of 0.035 ± 0.017 fmol per cell per h was observed with a detection limit of 0.30 μM. In conclusion, our droplet-on-demand method is a versatile and advantageous tool for cell encapsulation in droplets, droplet imaging and reaction detection using ESI/MS.

Identifiers

PMID39139235
PMCPMC11320962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.