Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39139188›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Enhancing postoperative anticoagulation therapy with remote patient monitoring: A pilot crossover trial study to evaluate portable coagulometers and chatbots in cardiac surgery follow-up.

Federico Guede-Fernández, Tiago Silva Pinto, Helena Semedo, Clara Vital, Pedro Coelho, Maria Eduarda Oliosi, Salomé Azevedo, Pedro Dias, Ana Londral

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Federico Guede-FernándezValue for Health CoLAB, Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2762-0333
Tiago Silva PintoÁrea de Coração, Vasos e Tórax - Cirurgia Cardíaca, Hospital de Santa Marta, Unidade Local de Saúde São José, Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0302-9290
Helena SemedoÁrea de Coração, Vasos e Tórax - Cirurgia Cardíaca, Hospital de Santa Marta, Unidade Local de Saúde São José, Lisboa, Portugal.
Clara VitalÁrea de Coração, Vasos e Tórax - Cirurgia Cardíaca, Hospital de Santa Marta, Unidade Local de Saúde São José, Lisboa, Portugal.
Pedro CoelhoÁrea de Coração, Vasos e Tórax - Cirurgia Cardíaca, Hospital de Santa Marta, Unidade Local de Saúde São José, Lisboa, Portugal.
Maria Eduarda OliosiValue for Health CoLAB, Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1002-4295
Salomé AzevedoValue for Health CoLAB, Lisboa, Portugal.
Pedro DiasValue for Health CoLAB, Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8875-2228
Ana LondralValue for Health CoLAB, Lisboa, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Prior research has not assessed the value of remote patient monitoring (RPM) systems for patients undergoing anticoagulation therapy after cardiac surgery. This study aims to assess whether the clinical follow-up through RPM yields comparable outcomes with the standard protocol. Methods: A crossover trial assigned participants to SOC-RPM or RPM-SOC, starting with the standard of care (SOC) for the first 6 months after surgery and using RPM for the following 6 months, or vice-versa, respectively. During RPM, patients used the Coaguchek Results: Twenty-seven patients participated. The median time in therapeutic range (TTR) levels during RPM were 72.2% and 50.6% for the SOC-RPM and RPM-SOC arms, respectively, and during SOC, they were 49.4% and 58.4% for SOC-RPM and RPM-SOC arms, respectively. Patients and the clinical team reported high trust and satisfaction with the proposed digital service. Statistically significant differences were only found in the cost of RPM in the RPM-SOC, which was higher than SOC in the SOC-RPM arm. Conclusions: Portable coagulometers and chatbots can enhance the remote management of patients undergoing anticoagulation therapy, improving patient experience. This presents a promising alternative to the current standard procedure. The results of this study seem to suggest that RPM may have a higher value when initiated after a SOC period rather than starting RPM immediately after surgery.

Indexed as

anticoagulation therapyDigital healthcarepatient-centredremote patient monitoringtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID39139188
PMCPMC11319326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.