ArticleJournal of medical biochemistry2024
Prognostic values of blood urea nitrogen/creatinine and cystatin C in patients with radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma.
Article in Journal of medical biochemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The relationship between preoperative serum cystatin C levels and postoperative oncologic outcomes in patients with renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 1641 patients.Updates in surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Prediction value of cystatin C for postoperative acute kidney injury of acute type A aortic dissection.Journal of medical biochemistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To evaluate the prognostic value of blood urea nitrogen/creatinine ratio (BUN/SCr) and cystatin C (Cys C) in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) after radical nephrectomy. Methods: The study analysed 348 patients with RCC who underwent radical nephrectomy. The optimal cut-off was obtained based on the ROC of specific survival outcomes and the maximum Youden index. The patients were divided into four groups: Group 1 (low BUN/SCr-low Cys C), Group 2 (low BUN/SCr-high Cys C), Group 3 (high BUN/SCr-low Cys C), and Group 4 (high BUN/SCr-high Cys C). The primary endpoint was cancer-specific survival (CSS), and the secondary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.