ArticleJournal of medical biochemistry2024
Forecasting the consumptions of coagulation tests using a deep learning model.
Article in Journal of medical biochemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A comparison of the optical method with the mechanical method in routine coagulation tests.Journal of medical biochemistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Laboratory professionals aim to provide a reliable laboratory service using public resources efficiently while planning a test's procurement. This intuitive approach is ineffective, as seen in the COVID-19 pandemic, where the dramatic changes in admissions (e.g. decreased patient admissions) and the purpose of testing (e.g. D-dimer) were experienced. A model based on objective data was developed that predicts the future test consumption of coagulation tests whose consumptions were highly variable during the pandemic. Methods: Between December 2018 and July 2021, monthly consumptions of coagulation tests (PTT, aPTT, D-dimer, fibrinogen), total-, inpatient-, outpatient-, emergency-, non-emergency -admission numbers were collected. The relationship between input and output is modeled with an external input nonlinear autoregressive artificial neural network (NARX) using the MATLAB program. Monthly test consumption between January and July 2021 was used to test the power of the forecasting model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.