ArticleGenetics2024
Automated cell lineage reconstruction using label-free 4D microscopy.
Article in Genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cell lineage tracing: Methods, applications, and challenges.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2025Review
- Multiscale characterization ofiScience · 2025Article
- DeepKymoTracker: A tool for accurate construction of cell lineage trees for highly motile cells.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patterns of lineal descent play a critical role in the development of metazoan embryos. In eutelic organisms that generate a fixed number of somatic cells, invariance in the topology of their cell lineage provides a powerful opportunity to interrogate developmental events with empirical repeatability across individuals. Studies of embryonic development using the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans have been drivers of discovery. These studies have depended heavily on high-throughput lineage tracing enabled by 4D fluorescence microscopy and robust computer vision pipelines. For a range of applications, computer-aided yet manual lineage tracing using 4D label-free microscopy remains an essential tool. Deep learning approaches to cell detection and tracking in fluorescence microscopy have advanced significantly in recent years, yet solutions for automating cell detection and tracking in 3D label-free imaging of dense tissues and embryos remain inaccessible. Here, we describe embGAN, a deep learning pipeline that addresses the challenge of automated cell detection and tracking in label-free 3D time-lapse imaging. embGAN requires no manual data annotation for training, learns robust detections that exhibits a high degree of scale invariance, and generalizes well to images acquired in multiple labs on multiple instruments. We characterize embGAN's performance using lineage tracing in the C. elegans embryo as a benchmark. embGAN achieves near-state-of-the-art performance in cell detection and tracking, enabling high-throughput studies of cell lineage without the need for fluorescent reporters or transgenics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.