ArticleClinics in shoulder and elbow2024
Factors associated with patient satisfaction after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: do they differ by age?
Article in Clinics in shoulder and elbow, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Liposomal bupivacaine as an adjunct to bupivacaine-based brachial plexus block in patients undergoing rotator cuff repair: a prospective double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Trial
- Machine learning-based prediction of retear after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a multicenter cohort study.JSES international · 2026Article
- Psychological well-being and physical activity before and after rotator cuff repair: a scoping review.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2026Review
- Aging Biology of Bone-to-Tendon Healing and the Epigenetic Clock: A Biological-Age Readout of Rotator Cuff Healing Capacity.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Outcomes and retear rates after subacromial and glenohumeral injection of a chitosan-based thermosensitive anti-adhesive agent during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a propensity score-matched analysis.Clinics in shoulder and elbow · 2026Article
- Preservation of the long head of the biceps tendon is a viable option in rotator cuff repair: a retrospective comparative study using Biceps Inflammation Section Integrity classification.Clinics in shoulder and elbow · 2026Article
- Post-operative pain control in arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs: a prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial comparing interscalene catheters and single-shot blocks.JSES international · 2026Article
- Enhanced Structural Outcomes With Acellular Dermal Matrix Patch Augmentation Versus Single-Row Repair in Large-to-Massive Rotator Cuff Tears: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- Classification of shoulder diseases in older adult patients: a narrative review.Ewha medical journal · 2025Review
- Physical examinations for older adults with shoulder pain: a narrative review.Ewha medical journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSeveral studies have investigated factors affecting patient satisfaction after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR); however, it is unknown if these factors vary according to age. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the factors associated with satisfaction of ARCR in individuals 70 years and older versus younger patients.
methodsAmong 319 consecutive patients who underwent ARCR, 173 were included. Patients were divided into an old age group (≥70 years) and a young age group (<70 years), and the two age groups were further divided into satisfied and unsatisfied subgroups. Patient satisfaction was evaluated at the final follow-up visit using a binary question (yes or no). Clinical outcomes were assessed preoperatively and at the final follow-up.
resultsSatisfaction rates in the older and younger age groups were 75.41% and 79.47%, respectively. Mean changes in Constant and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores were significantly different between the satisfied and unsatisfied subgroups (P=0.031 and P=0.012, respectively) in the young patients. In the old patients, there was a significant difference in the mean change in depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (P=0.031) and anxiety subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (P=0.044) scores between the satisfied and unsatisfied subgroups.
conclusionsFactors affecting patient satisfaction after ARCR differed according to age. Psychological improvement was more important to elderly patients, whereas restoration of function was more important to younger patients. Pain relief was important for both age groups. Level of evidence: III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.