Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39138764›Full record

ArticleActa neurochirurgica2024

Intraoperative ultrasound and magnetic resonance comparative analysis in brain tumor surgery: a valuable tool to flatten ultrasound's learning curve.

Ferran Brugada-Bellsolà, Pilar Teixidor Rodríguez, Antonio González-Crespo, Sebastián Menéndez-Girón, Cristina Hostalot Panisello, Roser Garcia-Armengol, Carlos J Domínguez Alonso

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ferran Brugada-BellsolàDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Germans Trias I Pujol University Hospital, Ctra del Canyet Sn, 08916, Barcelona, CP, Spain. fbrugada@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-7048-4061
Pilar Teixidor RodríguezDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Germans Trias I Pujol University Hospital, Ctra del Canyet Sn, 08916, Barcelona, CP, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0234-0899
Antonio González-CrespoDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Germans Trias I Pujol University Hospital, Ctra del Canyet Sn, 08916, Barcelona, CP, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1174-8818
Sebastián Menéndez-GirónDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Germans Trias I Pujol University Hospital, Ctra del Canyet Sn, 08916, Barcelona, CP, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7546-9127
Cristina Hostalot PaniselloDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Germans Trias I Pujol University Hospital, Ctra del Canyet Sn, 08916, Barcelona, CP, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1935-0524
Roser Garcia-ArmengolDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Germans Trias I Pujol University Hospital, Ctra del Canyet Sn, 08916, Barcelona, CP, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9315-0985
Carlos J Domínguez AlonsoDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Germans Trias I Pujol University Hospital, Ctra del Canyet Sn, 08916, Barcelona, CP, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5965-8152

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) is a profitable tool for neurosurgical procedures' assistance, especially in neuro-oncology. It is a rapid, ergonomic and reproducible technique. However, its known handicap is a steep learning curve for neurosurgeons. Here, we describe an interesting postoperative analysis that provides extra feedback after surgery, accelerating the learning process.

methodWe conducted a descriptive retrospective unicenter study including patients operated from intra-axial brain tumors using neuronavigation (Curve, Brainlab) and IOUS (BK-5000, BK medical) guidance. All patients had preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) prior to tumor resection. During surgery, 3D neuronavigated IOUS studies (n3DUS) were obtained through craniotomy N13C5 transducer's integration to the neuronavigation system. At least two n3DUS studies were obtained: prior to tumor resection and at the resection conclusion. A postoperative MRI was performed within 48 h. MRI and n3DUS studies were posteriorly fused and analyzed with Elements (Brainlab) planning software, permitting two comparative analyses: preoperative MRI compared to pre-resection n3DUS and postoperative MRI to post-resection n3DUS. Cases with incomplete MRI or n3DUS studies were withdrawn from the study.

resultsFrom April 2022 to March 2024, 73 patients were operated assisted by IOUS. From them, 39 were included in the study. Analyses comparing preoperative MRI and pre-resection n3DUS showed great concordance of tumor volume (p < 0,001) between both modalities. Analysis comparing postoperative MRI and post-resection n3DUS also showed good concordance in residual tumor volume (RTV) in cases where gross total resection (GTR) was not achieved (p < 0,001). In two cases, RTV detected on MRI that was not detected intra-operatively with IOUS could be reviewed in detail to recheck its appearance.

conclusionsPost-operative comparative analyses between IOUS and MRI is a valuable tool for novel ultrasound users, as it enhances the amount of feedback provided by cases and could accelerate the learning process, flattening this technique's learning curve.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsLearning CurveMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuronavigationAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMonitoring, IntraoperativeNeurosurgical ProceduresRetrospective StudiesUltrasonography, Interventional3D navigated ultrasoundBrain tumor surgeryIntraoperative imagingIntraoperative ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID39138764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.